Discussion about this post

User's avatar
hunterwalk's avatar

VERY biased but my answer is the best one

Expand full comment
Deepak Jha's avatar

@Gokul & @Nikhil prediction about Systems of Record vs. AI Agents is the one I keep coming back to. But I think there's a missing layer in that battle.

Systems of Record capture what happened. AI Agents execute what should happen. But neither captures why we decided.

That's the gap. When an LP asks "how did you make that call?" — Affinity can't answer it. ChatGPT can't answer it. The reasoning lives in IC discussions, Slack threads, and institutional memory that walks out the door when a senior partner retires.

Jeff Morris and Mercedes are right that memory becomes the moat. But for institutions, it's not just personal memory — it's decision memory. The audit trail of judgment that compounds over decades.

This is exactly what we're building at @Quantum Mosaic — decision infrastructure for institutional capital. We call it the "Judgment OS": encode how decisions get made, enforce consistency across teams, and evidence outcomes for LPs and regulators. The companies that own the decision graph — not just the relationship graph or the deal analytics — will own the infrastructure layer between SoRs and AI agents.

Foundation Capital published their "Context Graphs" thesis in December describing this exact gap. a16z's Big Ideas 2026 called for "systems of coordination" to manage multi-agent interactions. The category is emerging in real-time.

Excited to see how 2026 plays out — and to be building in the middle of it.

— Deepak Jha, Founder & CEO, Quantum Mosaic

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?